E11 introduced the TESP budget concept: breaking total external static pressure into four components (filter, coil, return ductwork, supply ductwork) so you can identify where the restriction lives. This article goes deeper into each component, covering the specific measurement techniques, typical ranges, failure indicators, and diagnostic interpretation for each.
The TESP budget tells you where the pressure is. Component pressure drop analysis tells you why it is there and what to do about it.
The filter is the most accessible and most frequently problematic component. It is also the easiest to test.
How to measure:
Alternatively, measure TESP with the filter installed, then remove the filter and remeasure. The difference is the filter's contribution. This shortcut works well on systems where accessing both sides of the filter with separate test ports is impractical.
Typical ranges by MERV rating:
| MERV Rating | Clean Filter Drop (inWC) | Dirty Filter Drop (inWC) | Common Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| MERV 1-4 | 0.02 - 0.05 | 0.05 - 0.10 | Fiberglass throwaway filters |
| MERV 5-8 | 0.05 - 0.10 | 0.10 - 0.20 | Pleated residential filters |
| MERV 9-12 | 0.08 - 0.15 | 0.15 - 0.30 | Higher-efficiency residential, some commercial |
| MERV 13-16 | 0.15 - 0.30 | 0.25 - 0.50+ | Hospital-grade, allergy-focused residential |
When to flag the filter:
As Jim Bergmann demonstrated during the Gas Furnace Workflow: "our total external static pressure is a fail because it's a little high, which means my filter is actually undersized." A component-level measurement confirmed the filter as the restriction source without needing to guess.
Total External Static Pressure measurement on a furnace showing manometer connected via tubing to Before Coil and After Filter measurement points, reading 0.51 inWC
Tips:
The indoor coil (evaporator on cooling systems, heat exchanger on furnaces) creates pressure drop from its fin density, face area, and cleanliness.
How to measure:
On some equipment configurations, direct measurement is difficult. See the Tips section below for alternatives.
Typical ranges:
| Coil Condition | Pressure Drop (inWC) |
|---|---|
| Clean coil, properly sized | 0.10 - 0.25 |
| Moderately dirty | 0.25 - 0.40 |
| Heavily fouled (needs cleaning) | 0.40 - 0.60+ |
These ranges assume residential split systems with standard fin density. Manufacturer-published coil data takes precedence when available.
Dirty coil indicators from pressure drop data:
A dirty evaporator coil does more than restrict airflow. It reduces heat transfer efficiency, which shows up as low temperature split, elevated suction pressure, and potentially low superheat. If you see a high coil pressure drop combined with poor refrigerant-side performance, the coil is the likely root cause.
[Visual Reference] A static pressure test port drilled into the ductwork between the furnace outlet and the A-coil casing. A short length of tubing connects the test port to a digital manometer. This tap location isolates the coil pressure drop from the rest of the duct system. The manometer reads the pressure difference across the coil by comparing this mid-point reading to the supply-side reading downstream of the coil.
Ductwork pressure drop is typically calculated as the remainder after subtracting filter and coil drops from the TESP budget. Direct measurement requires test ports at the return grille and supply register locations, which is not always practical.
Return ductwork:
Return Duct Drop = Total Return Side Pressure - Filter Drop
This isolates the pressure lost in the return duct system between the return grilles and the air handler. Typical range: 0.05 - 0.20 inWC for a well-designed residential system.
Supply ductwork:
Supply Duct Drop = Total Supply Side Pressure - Coil Drop
This isolates the pressure lost in the supply duct system between the air handler and the supply registers. Typical range: 0.05 - 0.20 inWC.
When ductwork remediation is needed:
Common ductwork issues that produce high pressure drop:
Pressure drops diagram showing four measurement points along the airflow path (Return, After Filter, Before Coil, Supply) with component pressure drop values at each point
Once you have all four component measurements, verify that they sum to approximately the measured TESP:
Filter + Coil + Return Duct + Supply Duct = TESP (within 0.05 inWC)
If the sum does not match, recheck your measurement locations. Small discrepancies (under 0.05 inWC) are normal due to probe placement variation and turbulence at measurement points.
Example budget analysis:
| Component | Measured Drop | Typical Max | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Filter (MERV 8, clean) | 0.08 inWC | 0.15 | Normal |
| Indoor coil | 0.18 inWC | 0.25 | Normal |
| Return ductwork | 0.12 inWC | 0.20 | Normal |
| Supply ductwork | 0.37 inWC | 0.20 | High |
| TESP Total | 0.75 inWC | 0.50 | Fail |
This budget immediately identifies the supply ductwork as the problem. The filter and coil are fine. The return duct is within range. The entire excess pressure (0.25 inWC above normal) is in the supply ductwork. The recommendation is supply duct evaluation and modification, not a filter change.
The component pressure drop analysis gives you the evidence to make a specific, justified recommendation:
The PDF report from measureQuick includes the TESP measurement and pass/fail result. Add your component analysis notes to the project to document the specific source of the restriction.
YouTube: (187,771 views, 24 min). TESP measurement procedure with discussion of pressure drop components and how to isolate them
YouTube: (250,236 views, 94 min). Comprehensive static pressure and airflow session covering budget concepts, component isolation, and field measurement techniques
YouTube: (3,389 views, 39 min). Static pressure workflow in measureQuick, including using pressure data to build component-level service recommendations
YouTube: (6,296 views, 7 min). How static pressure patterns in the return side reveal duct leakage
YouTube: - Covers the relationship between filter area, airflow, and pressure drop
YouTube: (23,171 views). Jim Bergmann discusses how "most technicians think of when they think of measuring air flow, they immediately think of static pressure," and why understanding each component's contribution is critical
On packaged units or tightly configured air handlers, there may not be a convenient location to drill a test port between the blower and coil. Options:
Jim Bergmann references a "four-point static pressure test" in the Cooling Commissioning walkthrough: "you'll test in the return after the filter, before the coil, and then in the supply duct." This four-point test gives you all the data needed for a complete component budget in a single set of measurements.
A filter can produce high pressure drop when new if it is too restrictive for the system. MERV 13 and above filters require larger filter racks or lower face velocities to avoid excessive restriction. If a brand-new filter is already at 0.20+ inWC, the filter is too restrictive for this system's configuration, regardless of its cleanliness.
Measuring each component involves multiple probe placements, and small errors accumulate. If your budget total is within 0.05 inWC of the measured TESP, that is acceptable. Larger discrepancies suggest a measurement location error or that the blower speed changed between readings.
DR Richardson (HVAC company owner) reported that "90% of our callbacks were airflow related. Static pressure was getting overlooked." Component pressure drop analysis is the tool that identifies exactly which airflow component needs attention - preventing the callback before it happens.
Prerequisites (complete these first):
Follow-up articles (next steps after this one):
Related in the same domain:
If you have questions about component pressure drop measurement or interpretation: